The rape of the west

Barely a day goes by without another story of Muslim immigrants raping the daughters of their benevolent host countries as the great horde continues their invasion of Europe as “refugees.”

Sweden is now the rape capital of the West and it doesn’t sound like any place there is safe. Swedes are now warned to stay away from public pools.

It’s a long article I’ve linked to but here are some of the tragic details, or, for those who are for the refugee relocation onslaught, the highlights:

-Young male asylum seekers have turned Sweden’s public swimming pools into ordeals of rape and sexual assault.

-Swedish politicians seem convinced that some education on “equality” will change the ways of men, who, since childhood, have been taught that it is the responsibility of women not to arouse them — and therefore the woman’s fault if the man feels like raping her.

-More and more Swedes are now avoiding public pools altogether.

-Staff at Malmö’s Hylliebadet family adventure pool were given strict instructions not to report certain things, and above all, never to mention the ethnicity or religion of those who cause problems at the pool.

-One of the problems is that young Muslim men refuse to take a shower before bathing, and keep their underwear on under their swim trunks. For obvious reasons, this is not allowed, and when the staff call out the violators on this, trouble and threats ensue. On several occasions, gangs have ambushed staff members on their way home from work, and the company was forced to hire guards to make sure employees get home in one piece.

-In 2015, when roughly 163,000 asylum seekers came to Sweden, the problems at public pools increased exponentially. More than 35,000 young people, so-called “unaccompanied refugee children,” arrived — 93% of whom are male and claim to be 16-17 years old. To prevent complete idleness, many municipalities give them free entrance to the public pools.

-Virtually all public pools in Sweden have become dangerous places, especially to women. During the first two months of this year, reports of rape, sexual assault and sexual harassment came in rapid succession.

-However, when we spoke to other staff members off the record, they told us they had been given strict instructions not to report certain things, and above all, never to mention the ethnicity or religion of those who cause problems at the pool. Another employee told Gatestone:

“Of course we have had incidents here, particularly involving Afghan men groping girls. Not long ago, a man of Arab descent was caught masturbating in the hot tub. But we are not allowed to report things like that. These men understand that it is forbidden when we tell them, but they keep doing it anyway. They just smile and keep on doing it.”

It’s both sad and fascinating to watch a once strong culture commit suicide by allowing an invading horde to take their women and their way of life out from under their noses with hardly a whimper in response. Liberalism and tolerance are the hallmark of a rotten society in it’s death throes. Allowing those from a failed culture to freely cross the borders into a stronger culture will never strengthen the host nation. Progressive policies ultimately lead to the death of nations; we have ample evidence all around us that this is so.

Advertisements

New CDC study on sexual orientation statistics

The Centers for Disease Control in the US has just released it’s most comprehensive study on sexual orientation and surprise, it does not paint the same picture as the Media and those with an agenda would have us believe.

Based on the 2013 NHIS data, 96.6% of adults identified as straight, 1.6% identified as gay or lesbian, and 0.7% identified as bisexual. The remaining 1.1% of adults identified as “something else,” stated “I don’t know the answer,” or refused to provide an answer. Significant differences were found in health-related behaviors, health status, health care service utilization, and health care access among U.S. adults aged 18-64 who identified as straight, gay or lesbian, or bisexual.

In short, only 2.3% percent of the population identifies as either gay, lesbian, or bisexual; it is not the 10-20% figures we are commonly told by those who propagate the false, inflated numbers. It should be noted that gays and lesbians also partake in other riskier behaviours at a much higher rate than straight people according to the survey. In any realm, 2.3% is a statistical aberration. Homosexuality and bisexuality are aberrant sexualities and are not biologically normative.

Thoughts on pride

Another “Gay Pride” weekend has come and gone in the city in which I live. After seeing photos and hearing people talk about it, here are a few random thoughts.

1) There is no gay gene. There is absolutely no scientific evidence in the literature to support such a notion. People are not born this way. They create these lives for themselves. Environmental inputs from early on take us all down a certain sexual path. We choose to embrace the cravings and lusts and passions that arise in us.

2) According to statistics, condom use in the gay community has plummeted since HIV has become manageable with drugs. No amount of money spent on sex education will change people’s behaviour. They will follow their lusts regardless of the consequences and regardless of the endless stream of information given to them.

3) Sexually transmitted diseases occur at a far greater rate in the gay community than in the heterosexual community. HIV is almost entirely a gay disease despite their efforts to make it seem otherwise. A new strain of incurable gonorrhea has arisen amongst gay people and will slowly spread into the mainstream population. It is a behaviour and lifestyle that promulgates disease.

4) Monogamy does not exist in gay relationships. The statistics on “indiscretions” or “gay hookups” within “committed relationships” so-called are greater than 95% in almost all studies conducted. Personal sexual gratification trumps all. There seldom is restraint and the virtue of self-control is all but unknown.

5) Biologically speaking, homosexuality is not normal. It is aberrant behaviour. Homosexuals are sexually aberrant. It occurs in only 2-3% of the population. They should be treated with kindness and love, but that does not mean we call their behaviour normal.

6) Homosexuality is an evolutionary dead end. If it were indeed a genetic disposition, this gene would have been selected against and disappeared from the population millenia ago. It is not a genetic disposition but a mental one. That is why it still persists today.

7) The word “pride” to denote this display of one’s sexuality seems to be a word that overcompensates for a reality that remains hidden. Why is there “pride” in ones orientation? Why is someone “proud” of their same sex attraction? Heterosexuals take no pride in what to them is normal. The word “pride” acts as a glossy veneer over something most understand to be unnatural. One should not have to announce and display their “pride” if they truly were.

8) If homosexuality is a legitimate orientation, then by the same logic so is pedophilia. You cannot argue for the validity of one without arguing for the validity of the other. Because the talk of sexual orientation is so ingrained in our culture, it will only be one to two decades from now before pedophiles will be a protected and celebrated class of sexual deviants. This was common behaviour in ancient Greece and Rome. We will sit back and watch this become an accepted practice.

9) We have lost what it means to be ashamed. Shame is no longer in our lexicon. We now take pride in shameful things and shame that which is good and pure and right. I do still think that shame exists and we all feel it from time to time. But we repress it deeply in order to do our best to not be affected by it or the guilt associated with our behaviours.

10) Any opposition to the gay narrative of the day will have one branded homophobic or a bigot. Name calling is a useful strategy and has been used throughout history to silence and denigrate ones opponents. It is for personal thoughts that homosexuals want to silence and shun those who oppose being told they need to accept this as normal.  That is fascism and It is a movement of fascists.

11) I also believe in the freedom for anyone to live how they so choose. And I also believe in the freedom for anyone to think and believe in whatever they want and not to be dictated to what beliefs are acceptable and what thoughts are not. One person should not dictate to another how they should live or what they should believe.

One for the social engineers

Equality may perhaps be a right, but no power on earth can ever turn it into a fact.                                               -Honoré de Balzac, French playwright

The slow creep

It’s an historical fact: eventually all societies die out or collapse, and they collapse under their own decaying weight.

They are born from struggle and undergirded by virtue. Individual responsibility and personal restraint are its foundation and have proven time and again to lead to happiness and prosperity. But prosperity is a double-edged sword for with it comes the tendency towards complacency and complacency to outright laziness. These in turn lead to the rise of vice and the ever increasing need for self-gratification. Personal restraint and virtue are mocked by the progressives who have a new vision and begin to undo all those things that were requirements for prosperity. Foundational pieces are removed or done away with one by one as gratification becomes the ultimate attainment for the new narcissistic classes. Once a sturdy foundation is removed or altered a house cannot stand, and it collapses and disintegrates under its own weight. And the next generations fail to learn the lessons of those who have failed before them and begin again with a new found zeal to repeat it all over again.

It is almost axiomatic:

Restraint leads to a prosperous society, and prosperity leads to complacency and the rise of a liberal progressivism; and this progressivism leads to disintegration.

This cycle will continue as the very nature of man dictates that it necessarily will.  Very few ever see the walls crumbling around them until they are buried in the rubble.

Thoughts on abortion

During World War II, the Nazis referred to the Jews as “rats.” Amidst the Rwandan genocide, the Hutus called the Tutsis “cockroaches.” Written into the US Constitution during the time of slavery, the Three-Fifths Compromise defined each black slave as three-fifths a human, or put more succinctly, less than fully human. The same thing has occurred in the modern abortion debate: a human life, a baby, is now unaffectionately referred to as a fetus, removing from it the human connotation and making it appear to be less than what it really is. When one defines their opponent in such a way as to make them appear to be an animal or sub-human, their eventual extermination becomes more palatable to the average person. (For more on this phenomenon read Less Than Human: Why we demean, enslave, and exterminate others by David Livingstone Smith).

Both sides struggle to frame the debate in ways that make their own positions appear more acceptable. Is a person pro-choice or pro-abortion? Is another pro-life or anti-choice? No matter how one characterizes themselves or their opponents, we can never lose sight of the fact that at the very heart of it we are talking about life, not just a clump of developing cells. To define a baby in such a way is to make it’s extraction seem far more remedial a procedure and far less distasteful to the average person. We are a culture where our comfort is the “value” we cherish most, while doing what may be difficult (raising a child of an unplanned pregnancy) proves to be too much of an inconvenience for many.

Words have powerful meanings. Those that have sought to exterminate their enemies in times past have known that and have defined them in ways that questioned their humanness. We must be just as strong in exposing this tactic and calling it what it is: wrong. But that assumes one even has the categories of right and wrong, good and evil, in their vocabulary; a point for another day.

There is much more I will say on this subject over time, but for now I leave you with this thought to ponder:

How can we speak of the termination of a pregnancy when what we really mean is the destruction of a human life? How can we talk of therapeutic abortion when pregnancy is not a disease needing therapy and what abortion effects is not a cure but a killing? How can we talk of abortion as a kind of retroactive contraception when what it does is not prevent conception but destroy the conceptus? We need to have the courage to use accurate language. Abortion is feticide: the destruction of an unborn child. It is the shedding of innocent blood, and any society that can tolerate this, let alone legislate for it, has ceased to be civilized. -John Stott

We are all hypocrites

Very few things detest us more than hypocrisy. We are all hypocrites. We all, at many times in our lives, say one thing and yet do another. It certainly is a repulsive trait in others, even more so in ourselves when it goes unrecognized.

With that in mind, there are two instances of public hypocrisy that come to mind that I find particularly offensive.

With a personal net worth north of a billion dollars thanks in large part to an early investment in Facebook, U2 singer Bono, back in 2006 called on the US government to devote more of it’s budget to the poor.

More recently, Pope Francis called on all the world governments to redistribute the wealth of individuals from the rich to the poor. This coming from someone who sits atop an organization with an estimated worth of $10 to $15 billion dollars.

I realize both men mean well. But asking others to be charitable without exhibiting the same with their vast wealth is hypocritical. It is not the governments job to take from some in order to give to others. But we have become a people who call for our government to take care of the less fortunate so we don’t have to. Progressives can appease their consciences by calling for the redistribution of others’ wealth while they remain the stingiest with their own.

If Bono and Pope Francis are really the caring men they purport to be, and I’m not implying they aren’t, they would give sacrificially first, before calling on others who most certainly have less resources than they do, to do likewise. Actions always speaker louder than words.